IVF following previous Tubal ligation is a Better Option than Surgical Reversal

Dr. Geoffrey Sher - December 12, 2015
IVF following previous Tubal ligation is a Better Option than Surgical Reversal

There is a relatively high success rates following tubal re-connection (reanastomosisis) in cases of previous tubal ligation (a birth rate of +/- 50% within 3 years of a successful surgery). However, IVF performed in a center of excellence produces almost the same success rate following a single attempt and is far less invasive than surgery. IVF also does not require general anesthesia, hospitalization, or a protracted time off work. Moreover by doing IVF and leaving the tubal ligation undisturbed, the woman retains subsequent control over family planning without having to resort to using some other form of contraception. Another point to be considered is the high incidence of tubal or ectopic pregnancy following the performance of tubal reanastomosisis high (about 20%).Major surgery also requires a few days of hospitalization and subsequently a few weeks of convalescence. There is also a risk of post-operative complications, increased cost, and time away from work, incapacitation, and significantly greater discomfort. The cost of a full cycle of IVF is in fact comparable to that of tubal reanastamosisis. In my opinion, provided that IVF is performed in a program with high success rates, tubal surgery for fixing damaged or blocked Fallopian tubes, with few exceptions, can no longer be justified financially or ethically. 

Ask a question or post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *.

Begin Your Fertility Journey

Sher Fertility Solutions is here to help you create your family.

Book A Consultation


Sher Fertility Solutions
425 5th Ave.
New York, NY 10016

Dr. Tortoriello (646)792-7476
Dr. Sher (702)533-2691